Units 3 and 4 Self Reflection

  • Due Mar 31 by 11:59pm
  • Points 20
  • Submitting a file upload
  • Available Mar 24 at 8am - Apr 5 at 11:59pm
This assignment was locked Apr 5 at 11:59pm.

For this assignment, you will have the chance to take a moment and reflect on what you have learned in these Units, providing honest and thorough answers to the following questions (use the rubric for guidance). Submit your work in a standard text document (Word preferred).

  1. What are three to five topics you found challenging in these Units?
  2. Review and explore these topics further so you are comfortable with them and describe what steps you took to do so.
  3. What are three to five topics that you enjoyed in these Units and wish we could explore further?
  4. What do you feel that you are excelling at in your student role?
  5. What areas of improvement do you recognize that you can work on some more in your role as a student?
  6. Is there anything in particular you want your instructor to know about what you need to be successful in this course?
1743483599 03/31/2025 11:59pm

Rubric

Keep in mind that 6 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
Critical Reflection Journal Entry with IO
Critical Reflection Journal Entry with IO
Criteria Ratings Pts
Critical Reflection: Content
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
10 to >9.23 pts EXEMPLARY Reflection demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments. Insightful and relevant connections made through contextual explanations, inferences, and examples.
9.23 to >8.0 pts ACCOMPLISHED Reflection demonstrates some degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments. Connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples.
8 to >7.0 pts DEVELOPING Reflection demonstrates limited critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions, activities, and/or assignments Minimal connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples.
7 to >0 pts UNSATISFACTORY - BEGINNING Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and course materials, activities, and/or assignments.
pts
10 pts
--
Additional Comments
Critical Reflection: Personal Growth
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
7 to >6.5 pts EXEMPLARY Conveys strong evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the self-assessment questions posed. Demonstrates significant personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences made, examples, well developed insights, and substantial depth in perceptions and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications.
6.5 to >5.5 pts ACCOMPLISHED Conveys evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the self-assessment questions posed. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences made, examples, insights, and challenges. Some thought of the future implications of current experience.
5.5 to >5.0 pts DEVELOPING Conveys limited evidence of reflection on own work in response to the self-assessment questions posed. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through few or simplistic inferences made, examples, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of the future implications of current experience.
5 to >0 pts UNSATISFACTORY - BEGINNING Conveys inadequate evidence of reflection on own work in response to the self-assessment questions posed. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrates a neutral experience with negligible personal impact. Lacks enough inferences, examples, personal insights and challenges, and/or future implications are overlooked.
pts
7 pts
--
Additional Comments
Writing Quality
threshold: pts
Edit criterion description
3 to >2.5 pts EXEMPLARY Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors.
2.5 to >2.25 pts ACCOMPLISHED Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.
2.25 to >2.0 pts DEVELOPING Average and/or casual writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.
2 to >0 pts UNSATISFACTORY - BEGINNING Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work.
pts
3 pts
--
Additional Comments
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communication
Student will communicate effectively.
threshold: 3.0 pts
4 pts Exceeds Expectations
3 pts Meets Expectations
2 pts Partially Meets Expectations
1 pts Does Not Meet/Did Not Meet
0 pts No Evidence
pts
4 pts
--
Additional Comments
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Relational Perspectives
Students will discuss their connections to the world.
threshold: 3.0 pts
4 pts Exceeds Expectations
3 pts Meets Expectations
2 pts Partially Meets Expectations
1 pts Does Not Meet/Did Not Attempt
0 pts No Evidence
pts
4 pts
--
Additional Comments
Total Points: 20 out of 20