Rubric

Find Rubric
Keep in mind that 1 student has already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluation.
Becoming Unsocial with IO
Becoming Unsocial with IO
Criteria Ratings Pts
Influence of "Great Minds" on social media participation
threshold: pts
5 to >4.0 pts
Proficient
Submission addressed how strategies of social influence may be applied by the "great minds" of technology to influence platform usage and addiction. Accurate examples for each identified strategy were articulated, demonstrating understanding of strategy and its influence over behaviors.
4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Submission presented how strategies of social influence could be applied by the "great minds" of technology to influence platform usage and addiction. Examples were presented with each strategy and reflected moderate to good understanding of the strategies and their influence over behaviors.
3 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Submission presented a singular strategy of social influence that could be applied by the "great minds" of technology to influence platform usage and addiction. Strategy was supported by example but lacked detailed demonstration of strategy understanding and/or its influence over behaviors.
0 pts
No Marks
Submission did not attend to this criteria.
pts
5 pts
--
Slactivism as cognitive dissonance
threshold: pts
7 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
Submission presented a position regarding presence of cognitive dissonance. Response included one or more examples and detailed explanation of position.
6 to >4.5 pts
Good
Submission presented a position regarding presence of cognitive dissonance. Response included an example of its usage and offered explanation of position. Some information was unclear or inaccurate.
4.5 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Submission lacked either a stance regarding presence of cognitive dissonance or supportive examples and explanation for position. Information failed to demonstrate thorough understanding of the topical content.
0 pts
No Marks
Submission did not attend to this criteria.
pts
7 pts
--
Regaining life focus
threshold: pts
5 to >4.0 pts
Proficient
Submission attended to all posed questions, providing details, and employing one or more components of attitude to explain responses. Component influence was easily recognized within response.
4 to >3.0 pts
Good
Submission attended to all posed questions, applying 1-2 components of attitude to explain responses. Responses included moderate demonstration of component influence.
3 to >0.0 pts
Needs Improvement
Submission failed to address all posed questions or omitted pertinent information. Attitude components were not accurately identified or elaborated on to demonstrate component influence.
0 pts
No Marks
Submission did not attend to this criteria.
pts
5 pts
--
Writing standards
threshold: pts
3 to >2.4 pts
Proficient
Writing adhered to APA style formatting, including grammar, punctuation, and syntax standards. Course text and outside source utilization was reflected through citations and referencing in APA style formatting.
2.4 to >1.8 pts
Needs Improvement
Writing was mostly free of grammatical errors and adhered to APA style formatting. Citations and/or references were missing or presented without APA style formatting.
1.8 to >0 pts
Needs Improvement
Writing contained multiple style and formatting errors. Citations and/or references were missing or lacked APA style adherence.
pts
3 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communication
Student will communicate effectively.
threshold: 3.0 pts
4 pts
Exceeds Expectations
3 pts
Meets Expectations
2 pts
Partially Meets Expectations
1 pts
Does Not Meet/Did Not Meet
0 pts
No Evidence
pts
4 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reasoning
Student will analyze information. 
threshold: 3.0 pts
4 pts
Exceeds Expectations
3 pts
Meets Expectations
2 pts
Partially Meets Expectations
1 pts
Does Not Meet/Did Not Meet
0 pts
No Evidence
pts
4 pts
--
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Relational Perspectives
Students will discuss their connections to the world.
threshold: 3.0 pts
4 pts
Exceeds Expectations
3 pts
Meets Expectations
2 pts
Partially Meets Expectations
1 pts
Does Not Meet/Did Not Attempt
0 pts
No Evidence
pts
4 pts
--
Total Points: 20 out of 20