Units 5 and 6 Self Reflection

  • Due Monday by 11:59pm
  • Points 20
  • Submitting a file upload
  • Attempts 0
  • Allowed Attempts 1
  • Available after Apr 27 at 12am

For this assignment, you will have the chance to take a moment and reflect on what you have learned in these Units, providing honest and thorough answers to the following questions (use the rubric for guidance). Submit your work in a standard text document (Word preferred).

  1. What are three to five topics you found challenging in these Units?
  2. Review and explore these topics further so you are comfortable with them and describe what steps you took to do so.
  3. What are three to five topics that you enjoyed in these Units and wish we could explore further?
  4. Looking back at your performance as a student throughout the course, what do you feel that you are excelling at in your student role?
  5. What areas of improvement do you recognize that you can work on some more as you continue onward in your student role?
1746507540 05/05/2025 11:59pm

Rubric

Find Rubric
Keep in mind that 2 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
Critical Reflection Journal Entry with IO
Critical Reflection Journal Entry with IO
Criteria Ratings Pts
Edit criterion description
Critical Reflection: Content
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
10 to >9.23 pts
EXEMPLARY
Reflection demonstrates a high degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments. Insightful and relevant connections made through contextual explanations, inferences, and examples.
Edit rating Delete rating
9.23 to >8.0 pts
ACCOMPLISHED
Reflection demonstrates some degree of critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions activities, and/or assignments. Connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples.
Edit rating Delete rating
8 to >7.0 pts
DEVELOPING
Reflection demonstrates limited critical thinking in applying, analyzing, and/or evaluating key course concepts and theories from readings, lectures, media, discussions, activities, and/or assignments Minimal connections made through explanations, inferences, and/or examples.
Edit rating Delete rating
7 to >0 pts
UNSATISFACTORY - BEGINNING
Reflection lacks critical thinking. Superficial connections are made with key course concepts and course materials, activities, and/or assignments.
pts
10 pts
--
Additional Comments
Edit criterion description
Critical Reflection: Personal Growth
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
7 to >6.5 pts
EXEMPLARY
Conveys strong evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the self-assessment questions posed. Demonstrates significant personal growth and awareness of deeper meaning through inferences made, examples, well developed insights, and substantial depth in perceptions and challenges. Synthesizes current experience into future implications.
Edit rating Delete rating
6.5 to >5.5 pts
ACCOMPLISHED
Conveys evidence of reflection on own work with a personal response to the self-assessment questions posed. Demonstrates satisfactory personal growth and awareness through some inferences made, examples, insights, and challenges. Some thought of the future implications of current experience.
Edit rating Delete rating
5.5 to >5.0 pts
DEVELOPING
Conveys limited evidence of reflection on own work in response to the self-assessment questions posed. Demonstrates less than adequate personal growth and awareness through few or simplistic inferences made, examples, insights, and/or challenges that are not well developed. Minimal thought of the future implications of current experience.
Edit rating Delete rating
5 to >0 pts
UNSATISFACTORY - BEGINNING
Conveys inadequate evidence of reflection on own work in response to the self-assessment questions posed. Personal growth and awareness are not evident and/or demonstrates a neutral experience with negligible personal impact. Lacks enough inferences, examples, personal insights and challenges, and/or future implications are overlooked.
pts
7 pts
--
Additional Comments
Edit criterion description
Writing Quality
threshold: pts
Edit rating Delete rating
3 to >2.5 pts
EXEMPLARY
Well written and clearly organized using standard English, characterized by elements of a strong writing style and basically free from grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling errors.
Edit rating Delete rating
2.5 to >2.25 pts
ACCOMPLISHED
Above average writing style and logically organized using standard English with minor errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.
Edit rating Delete rating
2.25 to >2.0 pts
DEVELOPING
Average and/or casual writing style that is sometimes unclear and/or with some errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling.
Edit rating Delete rating
2 to >0 pts
UNSATISFACTORY - BEGINNING
Poor writing style lacking in standard English, clarity, language used, and/or frequent errors in grammar, punctuation, usage, and spelling. Needs work.
pts
3 pts
--
Additional Comments
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Communication
Student will communicate effectively.
threshold: 3.0 pts
4 pts
Exceeds Expectations
3 pts
Meets Expectations
2 pts
Partially Meets Expectations
1 pts
Does Not Meet/Did Not Meet
0 pts
No Evidence
pts
4 pts
--
Additional Comments
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Relational Perspectives
Students will discuss their connections to the world.
threshold: 3.0 pts
4 pts
Exceeds Expectations
3 pts
Meets Expectations
2 pts
Partially Meets Expectations
1 pts
Does Not Meet/Did Not Attempt
0 pts
No Evidence
pts
4 pts
--
Additional Comments
Total Points: 20 out of 20